A Married State
‘A Married State’
Here is a detailed guide to Katherine Philips’ poem 'A Married State’, from the Songs of Ourselves Volume 1 anthology. It includes:
Overview: a line-by-line “translation” of the poem’s meanings and interpretations
Writer’s methods: an exploration of Philips’ poetic choices and potential effects
Understanding the text: an exploration of the themes and ideas within Philips’ poem
A Married State: Overview
Overview
In order to answer an essay question on any poem, it is important to understand what it is about. This section includes:
An overview of the poem
A “translation” of the poem, section-by-section
A commentary of each of these sections, outlining Katherine Philips’ intention and message
‘A Married State’ overview
Katherine Philips expresses a bold opinion on the state of marriage from a female perspective in seventeenth century Britain. Her poem, ‘A Married State’, offers advice to all single women on why they should avoid marriage as it often limits rather than frees women.
‘A Married State’ breakdown
Lines 1-2
Translation
The poem begins with an omniscient narrator declaring that marriage brings little comfort (“ease”), and that it is difficult to keep even the “best” husbands happy
Philips’ intentions
The poem’s opening statement offers a harsh criticism on the trials of marriage
Philips extends this criticism to all marriages, even the “best ones”, and claims it is because husbands cannot be easily satisfied
Lines 3-4
Translation
The poet says that you can see the ill-ease in the wives’ faces:
They are “careful” to hide their troubles and “misfortunes”
They “dissemble” their faces, meaning they put on a happy face as a disguise
Philips’ intentions
Philips hints at the imbalance of power in seventeenth century marriages, and how this leads to deceit
She alludes to females being forced into marriage, implying wives cannot express their negative feelings which, in turn, represses them:
If only people would look more closely, they would see that the wives are pretending
Lines 5-6
Translation
The narrator says that virginity is a happy (“content”) state to be in as it is innocent
Philips’ intentions
Philips’ reference to a crown suggests that, for women, staying single brings power and contentment
By describing virginity as innocent, Philips implies marriage is the opposite:
Perhaps that the state, or experience, of marriage is corrupt
Lines 7-10
Translation
The narrator offers a list of reasons to stay single and childless:
There is less fear as there are no “blustering”, bad-tempered husbands
There is no pain from childbirth, nor constantly crying children
The image of “worldly crosses” may refer to temptations that would take one away from spirituality or religion (“prayers”)
Philips’ intentions
The poet’s argument on the merits of staying single is made more persuasive with anaphora, “No”
Philips’ list of “tears” and “fears”, offences, and distractions avoided by staying single uses emotive and religious imagery to strengthen her argument:
The suggestion is that the speaker has found out these things too late
Lines 11-12
Translation
The poet says that staying single and childless means “you” (women) are free of all the worries that go along with marriage (“matrimony”) and motherhood
Philips’ intentions
The confident voice of Philips’ narrator presents a female speaker who uses logic and persuasive language to present a strong argument against marriage
The poem subverts traditional and patriarchal ideas of marriage by suggesting a husband is an annoyance, or a burden, rather than a benefit
Lines 13-16
Translation
The narrator addresses a female listener (“madam”), and offers advice:
“Turn” away and renounce the shallowness (“levity”) of love
Do not allow temptation, desire, or a “wild nature” to take control
The poet references an old proverb about unmarried women, and says it is not true:
The proverb stated that unmarried women caused otherwise good men to stray from their marriages, like “apes in hell”
Philips’ intentions
Philips’ poem is presented as advice to all unmarried women
The strength of her tone is conveyed in the repetition of “turn”, and emphasised in the word “apostate”, which means to desert or abandon a cause
Philips alludes to the idea of self control as necessary to avoid marriage
She calls for abstinence and self-discipline, ending with a witty and defiant reference to traditional criticisms of single women
A Married State: Writer's methods
Writer's methods
This section is organised into: form, structure, and language. The poetry question in the CIE Literature for English exam wants you to consider all three as “writer’s methods”. This is because a poet uses all three to create meaning or convey ideas. Consider things like the poet’s choice of form and perspective, its rhythm, rhyme, and tone of voice, and imagery.
Examiners require you to focus on the poem’s deeper ideas, and in a sensitive way. To do this, you can discuss how the poet’s methods reveal their aim or purpose. That is why all the analysis below is arranged by theme and includes Katherine Philips’ intentions in terms of her choices of:
Form
Structure
Language
Form
The poem is presented in an ordered form through which to give her advice to all women. This allows her to present a rational speaker, one who has formed her strong and controversial opinions on marriage based on reason and logic.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
|---|---|---|
Individual identity | The poem’s tight, sixteen line stanza presents a controlled and disciplined speaker who addresses an implicit, female listener, “Madam” | Philips subverts traditional attitudes that women are emotional and irrational by constructing a convincing voice with which to criticise seventeenth century social norms |
Structure
In ‘A Married State’, Katherine Philips uses a sophisticated structure to present a scathing attack on traditional ideas of marriage.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
|---|---|---|
Romantic relationships | The poem is in strict iambic pentameter and made up of rhyming couplets throughout | Philips’ speaker is authoritative and calm in order to present the benefits of avoiding marriage, and to empower unmarried women to remain so |
Language
Katherine Philips uses sophisticated imagery to highlight contrasts between married life and unmarried life.
Theme | Evidence | Poet’s intention |
|---|---|---|
Romantic relationships | The poet uses alliteration to draw attention to key ideas, such as in “crowned with much content”, and “Turn, turn apostate to love's levity”, ending the poem with a metaphor alluding to “hell” | Philips avoids elaborate imagery as the poem is a rational argument but, at times, a passionate speaker alludes to classical images that contrast the bliss of staying single with the shallowness and misery of romantic love |
A Married State: Understanding the text
Understanding the text
The poetry questions in the CIE Literature for English exam encourage an informed, personal response, which means that it is not enough just to know the poem, but that you will also need to develop a sound understanding of the poem’s themes, main ideas, settings, situations and events to explore the writer’s intentions and methods. This section has been divided into two main themes that Katherine Philips examines in her poem ‘A Married State’:
Individual identity
Romantic relationships
Individual identity
Katherine Philips is a highly respected and influential seventeenth century British poet and writer
Philips’ poetry is known for its sophisticated, classical styles:
Her poem ‘A Married State’, written in the late 1640s-1650s, adheres to traditional poetic techniques
As much of her work examines the female experience, she is considered to be an early feminist writer
The poem ‘A Married State’ can be considered a cautionary message
The poem challenges typically idealised female roles, such as its suggestion that motherhood is best avoided:
Philips alludes to seventeenth century conditions for women, including painful and, often, fatal childbirth
Romantic relationships
Katherine Philips’ seventeenth century poem, ‘A Married State’, is a challenge to gender imbalances that, the poem argues, manifest in dysfunctional marriages
She alludes to the way marriage is considered to be a Christian institution:
The poem refers to the way unmarried women were perceived as wild and dangerous; a myth, she says, that was designed to force them into marriage
At the time, marriage amongst all but the lower classes could provide security and status; a financial contract that can improve social standing:
Often, a young girl was married to a much older man
As women were not allowed any financial or personal independence, this led to power imbalances:
The poem alludes to the limited power of wives: they are fearful of abusive husbands and fake their happiness to avoid retribution
The controversial nature of Philips’ poem is evident in the line “Turn, turn, apostate”
This suggests unmarried women are traitors for abandoning social norms
For further advice and guidance on how to answer the poetry question, please see our detailed guides on Paper 1 Section A: what the question is asking and how to get full marks. You will also find an example of a full, annotated model answer.
It is important to remember that no marks are given for comments on any of the other poems studied in the anthology. Your response should concentrate only on the poem given.
Sources
https://www.cambridgeinternational.org/Images/414779-2020-specimen-mark-scheme-1.pdf.
Songs of Ourselves: Volume 1: Cambridge Assessment International Education Anthology of Poetry in English. Cambridge University Press & Assessment, 2018.
https://wordhistories.net/2017/09/19/lead-apes-in-hell
.